Quantcast
Channel: PNGBLOGS
Viewing all 2198 articles
Browse latest View live

THE PETER O'NEILL WAY

$
0
0
 PNGBLOGS

Yes, it's back to the nonsensical purchase of the Fokker 70, built 20 years ago by the bankrupt and long departed Fokker airline maker. All Fokker planes in Air Niugini's fleet are ancient: between 20-25 years old. Air Niugini still uses them because it's another money-losing SOE that through creative auditing and delayed financial reports, covers up its reality: It has no financial ability to buy new airplanes and is slowly heading down the financial toilet. In response, Peter O'Neill names failed businessman Sir Frederick Rieher the Chairman! You may remember the name Reiher.

A few years back he was given K40 million to build 200 houses near Gerehu. He built 2 or 3 and that was it (http://www.pngblogs.com/…/k40m-housing-project-contract-sho…). We don't know for certain that he returned the money (naturally, he promised to. Even Paul Tientsen promises to return the money he stole), but we do know that he continued as a PM office staff member, his reputation unblemished, and he came up with a few million kina around that time to buy a house in Brisbane, where he joins Pais Wingti and a number of of other dishounourables in living the fine life out of sight of the PNG public.

With this second Fokker70 article, we have another round of O'Neill Tok, this time mostly presented by the dishonourable Reiher. Peter O'Neill is the master of doubletok, denialtok, 180 degree reversal tok, and outright lies. O'Neill recruits people like Reiher who talk the same tok to assist with creating misinformation and disinformation. The main goal is never to communicate accurately what government is doing. More likely they're out to cover up obviously irrational decisions or actions and present them as if they make sense.

They DO make sense but only in the context of the hidden scam. In learning how to translate O'Neill tok, one technique that usually works is to assume that Peter and his friends are up to something. Specifically they're on the lookout for legal loopholes to corruptly put government money into their pockets. Armed with that (usually true) assumption, you then read the story again and think about what kind of schemes they might be planning that explains what would seem to be, on the surface, an irrational decision or action by the government.

In the case of anything to do with Air Niugini these days, the candidate "hidden story" is that O'Neill and his cronies are beefing up Air Niugini using public funds to get it packed with assets. Why that? They already know from the last attempt at privatising Air Niugini years ago that absolutely no reputable outside airline is interested in acquiring this bottomless money-eating monster. Thus, when privatisation is forced onto the airline, it will be sold at rock bottom prices, probably spinning off the domestic and an international divisions into 2 different hands. Expect the international unit to remain in government hands as a perpetual money-losing business so that the whole gang of corrupts can escape for PNG for holiday or residence in Australia whenever they like.

When it's offered for sale, we'll all want Air Niugini to be sold to an "experienced" operator. And who'll raise their hand? Why, it'll be Peter O'Neill, proud owner of South West Air! Of course, we should politely overlook that only 2 planes make up this company, and ignore the fact that if O'Neill makes the purchase, he will have pulled off a brilliant, dubiously legal move, to gain control of public assets at a very cheap price. More likely, he would pursue acquiring the assets through a giaman holding company where his name is not so conspicuous.

Dear readers, expect the same kind of scams being planned for most of the SOE's. It will either be outright purchase by O'Neill cronies or hidden kickback schemes to outside companies that win the "competition" to own their very own former SOE. In the case of Air Niugini, if the growing fleet of aged airplanes can't be managed profitably, there's always a solution -- close down the airline after you've bought it from the government, sell all the assets to crazies around the world, then sit down and count all the money you've made at the expense of the poor taxpayer! It's the Peter O'Neill way.

Eschatology: The Myth of End Times

$
0
0


By CASPER DAMIEN
 
“Don’t fall into the temptation of this world, this world is evil. God loves you, repent and be baptized again in the name of Jesus Christ and receive him in your life as your personal savior and you will be saved because the End of the World is near.”  

The story of the End of the World or the Second Coming of Jesus is very interesting and at the same time it’s frightening. This topic is very much part of Christianity. All Christians believe the Second Coming of Christ and this world will come to end. It’s recorded that Christianity as a world religion has 2.18 billion Christians or followers of Jesus Christ in the world today. While the total population of the world is about 7.5 billion people. Besides Christianity as a world religion, other major religions of the world including Islam has 1.62 billion followers known as Muslims, Hinduism about 1 billion followers, Buddhism about 500 million followers and Judaism has about 15 million followers in the world today. The irony is that if only Christians believe in the Second Coming of Jesus as End of the world and only Christians be saved, how about the rest of the followers of the world religions. Are they going to be saved or damned to hell? Already this is what Christianity implied to other world religion. Where is the logic? Is this erroneous itself?              

To understand the Second Coming of Christ, this topic should be discussed in detail because it is very much part of Christian sect teaching. To understand this issue it is very important to introduce to you this term “Eschatology”. What is Eschatology?   

The term eschatology from Gk. eschton“last things.” The biblical perspective concerning events to take place in the last days. (see Heb. 1:2; Isa. 2:2-4; Hos. 3:5 “later days”). While the Old Testament highlights the future of the community (Israel), the New Testament pays special attention to the destiny of the individual. In the Old Testament the idea of eschatological event is established when God made his covenant with his chosen people on Mt. Sinai (after delivering Israel from Egypt). God’s dealings with Israelites through the prophets of the promise and God’s future contact with Israel, usually through the so-called “Day of the Lord” (or Day of Judgment) is the eschatological expression of this idea. For the prophets the Day of the Lord represented salvation, hope, and vindication for the righteous as well as judgment and doom for the unrighteous. 

The New Testament, which reaffirms the Old Testament concept of the Day of the Lord, broadens it as well. The Day of the Lord is taken to mean the First and Second Coming of Jesus. Both Jesus and Apostle Paul incorporated their concern for the future within the general framework of their teaching and preaching. Shortly before Jesus’ trail and death, Jesus told his disciples about the destruction of the temple. Jesus explained that certain signs were to be seen before the destruction of the temple and the end of the age (Mk. 13 par.). In the early letters of Paul, he attempted to correct 
misunderstandings concerning Christ’s return, a subject he evidently discussed with the Thessalonian believers on his second missionary journey. While reminding them for Jesus’ Second Coming (1 Thess. 1:10), Paul deemed that it is necessary to point out both raised dead and those still alive would together meet the lord “in the air” (4:17) at an unknown time (5:2, “like a thief in the night”). When the Thessalonian believers did not believe in what Paul was saying about the Second Coming of Jesus, in his second letter to them he repeatedly warned the believers concerning the Day of the Judgment to come (see Metzger 1987: 348). 

In the New Testament, it presents the two aspects of the eschatology; the present and the future. In the Present Eschatology, both Jesus and Paul distinguished between present idea of the kingdom as “realized kingdom (eschatology). Mark preserves Jesus pronouncement at the beginning of his Galilean ministry: “the time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent, and believe in the gospel” (Mk. 1:14; cf. Matt. 4:17). In Paul’s other passages of his letter he urged believers to accept Christ, for he perceives that salvation is very near (Rom. 13:11-14; “at hand,” Phil. 4:5). In the Future Eschatology, there were indications in many passages that Christ who by bearing the sins of the people made salvation possible (Heb. 9:26), will return one day to complete his work of redemption (e.g., v.28; 10:25; Jas. 5:7-9; 1 Pet. 1:5). Christ who ascended to heaven forty days after his resurrection (Acts. 1:3, 11), promised to return with power and glory (Matt. 24:30; cf. 1 Thess. 4:16-17, visible to all (Rev. 1:7). Though Jesus and Paul thinking of the imminence of this event, both cautioned against calculating an exact date for the Second Coming of Jesus (Matt. 24:27, 36; 1 Thess. 5:2) (Metzger 1987: 348). 

The idea of the Second Coming of Jesus (Return of Christ) also implied the resurrection of the human body or dead. Paul wrote the Thessalonians that Jesus whom he believed to have died and risen again (1 Thess. 4:14), would at his return raise those “asleep,” along with those still alive (vv. 14-18). To the Corinthians Paul explained that since Christ arose from the dead (1 Cor. 15:4), he would rise to life, when he comes, those who belong to him (v. 23). When Jesus comes salvation will be only for the righteous and doom for the unrighteous. Jesus told his disciples that at the Day of the Judgment all the people will be gathered together into two groups-those who would receive life eternal and inherit the kingdom of God because they are righteous, and those who would endure eternal punishment since they had failed to perform good works (Matt. 25:31-46). In John’s account, Jesus proclaims a resurrection to either life of judgment, depending on whether one has done good or evil (Jn. 5:28-29; cf. Rev. 20:12-15). Paul teaches the similar type of judgment (Rom. 2:1-11; cf. Gal. 6:7-10) (see Metzger 1987: 349).   

In the similar mode like Apostle Paul, for pastors and street preachers, many preached that we are in the last days and Jesus is coming soon. Current world issues of wars and killing of people, massive natural disasters, greenhouse effect and climate change, HIV/AIDS, Political dominance of one nation as supper power, massive technological development and increase of knowledge today is the Signs of Time as the End of the World is near. Their message is “The end of the world is near so repent and be baptized again and take Jesus as your personal savior.” Eternal life with God in Heaven for the righteous and Hell for those who are unrighteous. That is to imply that when God had taken His chosen people to live with Him in Heaven and Jesus has taken his eternal throne, God will then destroy the heaven and earth and create new heaven and earth which the righteous will enjoy complete redemption of God in it.    

Is the myth of the second coming of Jesus real? For Christians, its real and the answer is yes, but for other world religions who do not believe in Jesus Christ, for them this issue of send coming of Jesus is not real. And so where do we draw the line?   

YASAUSE APPLIES TO ‘HUMAN RIGHTS TRACK’ FOR ENFORCEMENT OF HIS HUMAN & CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

$
0
0

David Cannings. His Human Rights application is due to be heard on 28 May 2015.
Doctor Theo Yasause, former Climate Change boss and the former Chief of Staff to former Prime Minister Grand Chief Sir Michael Somare, has applied to Human Rights Track for the enforcement of his human and constitutional rights. Dr Yasause appeared in Court this week for a Directional Hearing heard by Justice

On Friday the Post Courier reported ‘Yasause raises human rights issue’ whilst Radio New Zealand reported ‘Jailed PNG official files complaint’, however both media outlets did not report that Dr Yasause has applied to Human Rights Track for the enforcement of his human and constitutional rights. Human Rights Track, which is headed by 'Track manager' Justice David Cannings, is a recent development in the PNG Judicial system.

“An interesting feature of our (PNG) Human Rights rules which we are informed is not found anywhere else in the world is the provisions in the rule which empowers the Court or its officers to initiate human rights breach complaints against those who offend. These provisions are found in Order 23, Rule (9) (1) of the Human Rights rules.

Any Judge or officer of the Court or any member of the Court staff or any other person, body or authority, including any member of the public, may bring any instance of alleged or suspected breach of human rights or freedoms to the attention of the Court by delivering to the Registrar a completed statement of Alleged or Suspected Breach of Human Rights, in Form 127.” (Citation source: pngjudiciary.gov.pg)

The premise of Dr Yasause’s Human Rights application is understood to be due to delay in the handing down of a decision on his Supreme Court Appeal regarding his conviction for murder.
Dr Yasause, who earned a PhD ‘magna cum laude’ from the Centre for Strategic Studies at a University in Paris, France in 2005, was charged by police in February 2011 for murder and then denied bail firstly by the police and later by the court. He was convicted of murder in 2012, whilst a remandee at Bomana prison, and sentenced to 28 years imprisonment.

He had argued that he was wrongfully convicted for an offence he did not commit and is seeking his constitutional rights to be enforced under several constitutional rights provisions covering health and unequal treatment. His conviction he argued was based on fabricated evidence. Because of this and other appeal grounds it is believed that he would have 100 percent success rate in his appeal, however a decision on his appeal has been pending since December 2013.

PNG NEWS

Student Boycotts Are Reasonable Responses To Decades Long Government Coverups On How Bad PNG School have Become

$
0
0


Those who have studied overseas know in an instant how bad our PNG schools are, all the way to university level.   An article in PNG Blogs some time back (http://www.pngblogs.com/2014/07/how-bad-are-papua-new-guineas.html) revealed it in black and white rankings.   

Our best PNG university, Divine Word, is worse than the best university in the failed state of Somalia.   Every time politicians speak at commencements they promise schools something that almost always is never delivered.   Parents in rural areas cry for new classrooms but say nothing about teachers to teach the children, or books that allow children to learn more than their teachers. 
This year we have already seen a boycott by UNRE (former Vudal College) students over mismanagement at that institution.   UNRE is one of the worst ranked universities in the world. 
Now we have a student strike at Polytech in Lae.  In all cases, the core issue is bad education.   The source of that problem is continued government pretence about supporting our schools, but never putting significant money where their mouths are.

Last year we had the infamous Unitech Saga boycotts that drew national attention (http://www.pngblogs.com/2014/04/why-2014-unitech-boycott-succeeded.html).   Again the core issue was the quality of education and students getting sick of the corruption and money mis-use that had characterised the previous administration there.    UPNG joined in a strike, but it was short-lived as the government, through OHE, had close ties with the UPNG Vice Chancellor and moved quickly to compromise the boycott and buy out student government leaders (http://www.pngblogs.com/2014/08/covering-up-crime-at-upng.html).  

Peter O'Neill has been a disaster for improving the delivery of quality education.   His free education strategy is nothing more than a ploy to encourage dependency on the government, which enhances handout mentality, but with the goal of generating more votes for Peter O'Neill and his PNC in 2017.   Free education has made the quality of education worse as classrooms have become  packed to the walls with roughly the same number of new teachers coming out of the system.
   
O'Neill's self serving "Peter O'Neill University" (http://www.pngblogs.com/2014/09/pngs-master-of-deception-unveils-new.html) to be built in his home province (of course!) is an obvious middle finger flipoff directed towards PNG's existing universities ( http://www.pngblogs.com/2014/10/go-rot-in-hell-peter-oneil-tells-upng.html ).   

 PNG universities have apparently overall have received no increase in funding during the entire Somare and O'Neill administrations, if you consider the effects of inflation.  They have actually declined in funding.   Despite all this, the Vice Chancellors, while apparently complaining a lot in private, have never had the guts to make this into a national issue, to be debated by all. Last year O'Neill bought the silence of Divine Word University's President, Fr Jan Czuba, by appointing him to head this new university in the middle of nowhere.  

ACT NOW PNG was the first to come out on the social media, putting together all the student protests in their common thread ie that students are sick and tired of bad education and bad learning conditions in PNG (http://www.actnowpng.org/blog/k780m-stolen-why-are-students-still-boycotting-classes-rundown-facilities).    

The Lae Polytech students have it right:  where it the promised money?   Where are the results of this promised money to improve their learning environment?
Where the students are wrong is in blaming the Polytech administration for the problem.   On the other hand they are justified if blaming the administration for not speaking up publically against the government's strangling of education in this country and the continued coverup of what they're doing.     
May student strikes and boycotts begin to spread throughout this land in a rising testimony by students to the government and us largely silent parents that enough is enough.     

Development Overshadowed by Sorcery

$
0
0


The reawakening of the ancient belief in and practice of sorcery and witchcraft is one of the post-independent development issues. Although sorcery has been recently (2014) outlawed in Parliament, it has not been effective and the information of the repelling of the sorcery act has not been really disseminated and descended to the bulk of the population in the rural areas. Sorcery now becomes a very frightening thing in our community and individual life. Almost everyone relate misfortunes and deaths to sorcery and there is now a tendency to points fingers at someone or accuse others for sorcery. This trend is currently bad in PNG and it can also hinder development and progress in general.  

Development as we have seen so far refers not only to the economic or material progress of our people but also the spiritual, cultural, social and political aspects. Papua New Guinea is one of the unique countries in the world that has some of the best development goals and principles that are enshrined in the highest legal authority of the country: the Constitution. As Bernard Narokobi, a constitutional lawyer and a member of the Permanent Consultants to the Constitution Planning Committee (CPC), stated, “…the goals of our society ought to be enshrined in the constitution as the guiding stars that would steer our helmsmen and women as they took our national ship through uncharted waters, come storm, come peace,” 

Although we have the best National Goals and Directive Principles enshrined in the National Constitution our national leaders and their subordinates at the top bureaucratic level have failed us successively thus leading the country into disarray. Rampant political corruption has become a daily occurrence which ultimately destroys the honesty and the moral integrity of the nation’s leadership. As Dr. Luke Apa, a Catholic Priest and a Lecturer at Divine Word University stated, “…corruption within the political and bureaucratic leadership is one of the major factors for the stagnation of development, the frightening depletion of the natural resources, and the unequal distribution of national wealth and the rise of crime and poverty in the country”. Commissions of inquiry after commissions of inquiry have been established every year to investigate and to prosecute those who are involved in the corrupt practices but the outcomes have seldom been successful.

The fast and current political scenario has left the rural population (85%) miss out on many of the basic government services. They lack access to good roads, bridges, schools and health services. They are denied of having equal opportunities to participate fully in national development and governance, and they have very low levels of cash income per annum, which is the most common indicator of poverty used for international comparisons.

Poverty and other socio-economic factors have driven our people further to engage in many unfavorable activities to make ends meet. The increasing growth of sorcery, cult and witchcraft practices and the related accusations and killings today are some of the symptoms of political ignorance and government inaction by not providing basic services to rural areas.

In order to address these issues effectively it requires the input of the leadership of this nation. This country needs a strong, transparent, reliable, and credible leadership to take ownership of the situation and to bring the nation forward in its development goals and objectives. Rephrasing the Governor for National Capital District, Honorable Powes Parkop, in his weekly opinion in 2009 stated that “a nation can have the best written constitution in place or ideal political system, promulgate the best civil and criminal code etc, but these (…) will not save a nation if the leadership is poor or lack quality and integrity.” He stated further that, “it is quality leadership that will ensure these systems, laws, code and processes work well to deliver a quality life and better future.” 

Such leadership is greatly required at all levels of our society. From the village level up to the districts, provincial, NGOs, churches, corporate sector and the top bureaucratic levels, especially the department heads and their subordinates and most importantly the political leadership of the nation. From these collaborative and concerted leadership efforts from different sectors of our society will bolster social capital and enhance community solidarity and stability. This will empower community leadership and bolster community development activities which will then enable communities to take ownership of their lives and their activities. 

Community empowerment is a formidable tool toward achieving socio-economic developments in rural areas that will help to alleviate people from their economic hardships rather than forcing them to resort to sorcery, cult and witchcraft practices.

The Ghost of the Past continues to haunt Indonesia & will Destroy Indonesia if it is not exorcised.

$
0
0




by Gabriel Ramoi

An Essay on West Papua Dedicated to all that have died in the cause of a Free and Independent West Papua.

Part One : O'Neill & the Force of Morale Persuasion

The earth shattering reversal of a 40 year policy of Denial by PNG on the plight of West Papua announced by Prime Minister Peter Oneill on Tuesday the 5THrd of February 2015 will come to be judged by history as the most important step taken by a sovereign state toward propelling West Papua towards Political Independence from Indonesia. It follow on the heels of that lone brave voice made by the Prime Minister of Vanuatu to the United nations in 2013 to put West Papua back on list of UN Trust territories and the Decolonization Committee of the United nations. The Statement by the Prime Minister is a bold move and one that that has not be made lightly. It turns PNGs Foreign Policy on its head and will no doubt rattle Australia and will keep Academics busy in years to come in analyzing the significance and consequences of that Decision. Just like his call on O.K. Tedi this recent call on West Papua show the tenacity and the inner strengthen of Peter Paire the boy who grew up alone in the wilds of Las Wiru before he was acknowledged by his Irish Oneill Clan . Peter Paire has performed a sacred and moral act in the cause of humanity by facing up to a bully and to tell the bully to stop killing its own citizen. It is an act that all former Prime Ministers of PNG without doubt did not have the moral courage to face up to. The call by Prime Minister Oneil rides on the force of Moral persuasion and one in which Indonesia as a nation must confront and come to terms with.

Indonesias New Status as a Parliamentry Democracy & a MINT Nation
The retired British Banker and respected BBC radio Commentator [ and no doubt a clans men of our Prime Minister] Jim Oneil who first coined and gave the world the Term BRICS nations and recently MINT nations to identify the groups of nations that are set to leap frog from ‘emerging’ to middle income economies has a message for Indonesia.[ Indonesia by the way is the “ I “ in MINT, the others are Mexico, Nigeria and Turkey]. That while he is convinced that Mexico, Nigeria and Turkey will reach middle income Status by 2030 he not too sure whether Indonesia can make it . In his BBC series on MINT nations aired on BBC Radio 4 this time last year and widely quoted and reported inside Indonesian media by opinion shapers such as the America born and educated John Riady , [ The scion of that great Indonesian Banking ,Media , & Technology Empire The lippo Group ] Oneil said Indonesia had all the ingredients to be a successful nation, it had the Population density ,a vibrant young population the majority below 40 and a robust economy with an emerging middle class but there was some thing missing in Indonesia s DNA that he was not able put a handle on that has created doubts in his mind about Indonesia. That origin of that lingering doubt in Oneils mind can be traced back to a culture of denial of the dark historical events that have remained buried in the Indonesian sub consciousness for over 40 years until only three year ago when a young American Film maker named Joshua Openheirmer came along and brought it back to life in 2012, in an underground Documentary , 10 years in the making called the ‘Act of Killing’ .

The Act of Killing & the continuing Genocide Inside Indonesia

This powerful multiple award winning documentary captures the genocide that occurred within Indonesia between 1965 and 1966 which saw more then 2 million of its citizen killed in a horrific bloodbath that ushered in the Rule of President Soharto. This genocide saw Indonesia turning on itself in frenzy of killing that saw it wipe out its elites and intelligentsia consisting of school teachers and union officials and village chiefs together sadly with its vast population of its ethnic Chinese Merchant Class. Ariel Heryanto a Historian and Cultural Critic writing in the Tempo magazine [ a premier Indonesian News Paper had this to say ‘ The Act of Killing is the most powerful political film about Indonesia that I have ever seen, the arrival of this film itself is a historical event almost unparallel. It witnessed the bloody destruction of a foundation of this nation at the hands of Indonesians themselves on top a mountain of corpses of our fellow country men rolled out on a red carpet for the growth of gangster capitalism and political Islam. The act of killing exposes the hypocrisy at the heart of our country’s notion of patriotism and justice ‘.

The Human rights commission of Indonesia is quoted as saying ‘ If we are to transform Indonesia into a democracy it claims to be ,citizens must recognise the terror and repression on which our contemporary history has been built and come to terms with it”

Andreas Harsono of Human Rights Watch writing to the New York Times of 28th February 2014 put it all in perspective ‘ Mr.Oppenheimers film and the Indonesian Governments reaction to it are a powerful reminder of the culture of impunity and the lack of the rule of law that continues to weigh on Indonesia. This culture of impunity expresses itself in a systematic failure to hold accountable members of the security forces and Islamist militants who continue to commit abuse against religious minorities right throughout the country. The Islamic Peoples Forum, The Islamic Defenders Front and other Islamic groups are at the fore front of this intolerance. This groups continue to attack places of worship of the minority Shiite and Ahmadiyah sects as well as Christian churches. Although Government officials have played a passive and even active role in the violence the Government has failed to confront those responsible or to obtain redress for the victims. The legacy of impunity for crimes in 1965-1966 also extends to a lack of accountability for abuse by security forces operating in Indonesia most easterly Provinces of Papua & West Papua. Over the last three years in particular the Human Rights Watch has documented hundreds of cases where the police, soldiers and intelligence officers have used unlawful force in dealing with Papuans exercising their rights to peaceful assembly. The Government needs to provide accountability and to work towards dismantling the toxic culture of Impunity that vitamises Indonesia to this day”

Unfortunately the attitude of the Government Indonesia of the event of 1965 -66 and currently with regard to the Genocide in West Papua remains stubborn and unrepentant . In October 2012 Djoko Suyanto the Political Legal and Security Minister publicly justified the Killings saying’
This country would not be what it is today if the killings had not accured’

Such Public Statement by Government officials goes to show the distance that Indonesia is yet to travel in its understanding of liberty ,justice and fundamental freedoms . The scale of human tragedy in Indonesia in 1965-66 and the continuing genocide in West Papua cannot be under estimated. On the scale of Genocides conducted by States against their own People in recent living memory the Genocide in Indonesia compares to the scene at Belsen Concentration camp under Hitler’s holocaust against the Jews when the camp was first liberated and the chilling account of the holocaust was first broadcasted to the world by the voice of Richard Dimbleby of the BBC on the 19th of April 1945 and for the world to come to know the full horrors of the holocaust. Nor could one forget the Skulls that tells us of The Killing Fields of Cambodia under the Khmer Rouges and recently the Rwandan Genocide. The Documentary the Act of Killing is banned from screening inside Indonesia because the memory of the Genocide is still too fresh for most Indonesians. The Ghost of Indonesia past continues to be played out in West Papua and in this digital age the acts of unimaginable violence and human cruelty continues to be upset our of justice and decency.

Indoneisa & the Bandung Conference of 1955

In Bandung in 1955 Indonesia shared the stage with China, India and Egypt and stood proud among the giants of that Generation represented by Chou Enlai of China, Jawaharlal Nehru of India and Nasser of Egypt to made the call that will echo around the world will change the world for over in freeing one billion of mankind from the Clutches of European Colonialism and would speed the processes of decolonization which gave rise to the birth of our own Nation. Indonesia cannot be that great country on the world stage if cannot reconcile with his past and current history.

Part II a Road map for Engaging Indonesia over West Papua
Mitigating History through Demilitarisation of West Papua

What is the Message for President Widodo as he Visits PNG on Monday 11th of May 2015

The least that the Independent States in the Pacific can do for West Papua is to assist Indonesia, the Netherlands and the United States right the wrongs of History that led to the United nations 1969 debacle over West Papua by admitting UNLM [ United Liberation Movement of West Papua] into the MSG when it convenes this year in July . While the Republic of Indonesia currently enjoys observer status in the MSG, the admittance of UNLM into the MSG should not be at the expense of Indonesia, on the contrary both should be encourage to share this forum and this should be the message given to the President of the republic of Indonesia when we visits our Country on Monday the 11th of May 2105. Indonesia continues to have a large population of people of Melanesian decent inside Indonesia from Ambon to West Timor and therefore its presence as an observer in the MSG is essential.

As the President of the republic of Indonesia visits our country it is important for our Prime Minister not only to engage the president on the economic relations between our two countries which he must but importantly he must re affirm his statement made in his own address to our nation on the 5th of February 2015 to highlight the growing concern by the world community on the abuse of Humen rights violation inside West Papua . The PM must be reminded of the fact that the enslavement of a People by another is unnatural and Indonesia’s enslavement of the Melanesian People of West Papua is abhorrent to Humanity and more so to Melanesians in particular as Melanesian societies do not keep slaves and as a people we find the institution of slavery repugnant . The continued enslavement of West Papua by Indonesia offends our sense of Justice and Human Decency and just like it took a worldwide movement that ended Apartheid and Slavery so too will Indonesia’s occupation of West Papua come to pass through world condemnation. As Indonesia celebrates the 60th Anniversary of the Bandung Conference this year it should take the high moral ground in working towards giving West Papua its Independence just as Austraila has given us our. It would take the moral courage of Nelson Mandela to be prepared to willingly lay down his life for the cause of a unified South Africa free from racial intolerance that would relegate apartheid into the dust bin of History just as it took the Moral courage of Abraham Lincoln to fight a civil war to outlaw slavery in the United States , both President Widodo and Prime Minister Oneill as leaders can reach out to inspire a whole generation of their own people and the world to act together to correct the injustices they see in front of them in West Papua.

West Papua as a Zone of PeaceThe application of brute force and repression by States and State Actors to coheres ethnic and religiously different people to remain within a polity and to subdue their culture and religion through state sponsored act of terrorism and to deny them their basic rights and to force them to accept the predominant culture and religion have all come to naught since antiquity. The 1914 attempt by Muslim Turkey to vanquish Christian Armenia in recent memory attest to this fact . The brutality in which States and State actors have tried to impose their view on the rest of society through groups such as the Islamic State and Boko Haram and the level of violent atrocities committed by these groups to achieve their objective continues to upset our sense of decency and humanity just as the images of un imaginable brutality committed againt the People of West Papua by Indonesian state Actors to keep West Papua within the Indonesian Republic captured and transmitted electronically in real time continues to upset our sense of Humanity and decency.

No matter the justification put forward by Indonesia in its continuing rule over West Papua one thing is certain , over the last 50 years the world has witnessed the sad truth that Indonesian Rule in West Papua can only be sustained through Brutal Force and repression with the use of the military and Police for without the Police and the Military West Papua Rejects Indonesian Rule. It is now apparently clear that PNG can longer watch from the side, it must constructively engage Indonesia to deal with the Issue.

The road map for dealing with Indonesia over West Papua has been mapped out already from inside Indonesia and has been succinctly captured in the book by the leading West Papuan Priest and Journalist Fr. Neles Tebay in his Book puplished in 2025[ see copy of this book as attached] The road map proposed by Fr.Neles Tebay can be seen in the conclusion of his book. It simply calls on Indonesia to declare West Papua as a zone of Peace and to allow for the demilitarization of West Papua. The nexus between Human rights violation and military involvement in Gangster Capitalism inside Indonesia and in West Papua in particular is rampant where stealing by the Military of resources particularly in illegal logging has its roots dating back to the Soharto era where businesses by Army units are encouraged to supplement the wages and conditions of Indonesian servicemen. Since the fall of Soharto and the democratization of Indonesia this practice has been reduced in the rest of Indonesia but remains entrenched in West Papua despite the Grant of Special Autonomy in 2001 to West Papua.

Culture of Impunity- Continues in Indonesia unabated until today.
I grew up in the shadows of the great events that unfolded in the new Indonesian republic and in Dutch New Guinea in the 1960s as the son of a colonial Policemen at the PNG Border outpost of Wutung between 1968 and 1971 where my father Sgt Ramoi was in charge of the small Contingent of policemen under the leadership of District Officer Tony Try and stand witnessed to the acts of violence and cruelty committed then by the Indonesian Security forces against Papuans prior to the Act of Free choice in 1969 and which has continued unabated since. On the 26th of May 1969, I witnessed for the first time the Incursions into PNG by the Indonesian Military into a West Papuan Refugee Camp on PNG Soil at Wutung where it indiscriminately opened fired on men, women and children. It was also be at Wutung on that date that PNG exchanged gun fire with Indonesia for the first time. The Charge was led by a young PNG Cadet Patrol officer named Jerry Moka and Sgt Ramoi. These events are covered by reports filed by the New York Times Correspondences in Port Moresby Robert Trumbull covering the period leading up to the Act of Free Choice. The continued violation of PNG sovereignty with impunity and the indiscriminate shooting and killing by the Indonesian military of its own citizens in West Papua sets a pattern that continues to this day. As president of the SRC at UPNG in 1981 the SRC convened a Public Tribunal under the guidance of Henk Di Sivero of the UPNG Law School, to put on Trial Indonesian Rule over West Papua where evidence was educed from leading West Papuan Citizens ,which included two members of the then West Papuan 1961 Parliament Mr.Willaim Zonganau and Mr. Mr.Itar , it also heard evidence from Eliezer Jan Bonay Governor of Papua under Indonesian rule who fled his home land to avoid Indonesian persecution. We also heard evidence from leading members of the West Papuan Diaspora led by Dutch trained civil servents Henk and James Joku and Medical Doctor Dr.Adolf Soweri and Papuan Diplomat Moses Werror. The evidence given then demonstrated the culture of Impunity and lack of accountability by Indonesia over the Actions of it State actors in the violation of the civil rights of the people of West Papua which has continue to this day unabated. The latest of such case is that of the Ex-Police chief of Marauke Labora Sitorus who was convicted by the Indonesian Supreme court in 2014 for failure to account for his vast wealth gain as a result of illegal logging in Papua was convicted and sentenced yet today continues to live in his Mansion in Marouke a free man. In 1984 as a young member of parliament I had the privilege to be part of our country’s delegation that engaged Indonesia in a Dialogue on West Papua organized by the powerful Indonesian Independent think tank The Centre for Strategic and International Studies and I am all too familiar with the Indonesian views over West Papua based on a faulty version of History which asserts that early Indonesian seafarers conquered the oceans by travelling into Madagascar and also to New Guinea where they captured slaves. We now know that the reverse is true in that Melanesians from Raja Ampat and Serum have been conducting raids into Indonesian Waters since time immemorial as head hunters and that as recently as 1773 in Support of Prince Nuku of Tidore, fought his war against the European powers to help establish him as the Sultan of Tidore. The most convincing of the Argument put by Indonesia however to justify its rule over West Papua is though the legal principle which allows former territories of colonial powers to continue to be treated as a whole in the struggle for Independence although we know now through written evidence that West Papua was never transfer to Indonesia as can be seen in the 1947 Agreement between Indonesia and the Netherlands and that it remains a trust territory of the United nations to this date not withstanding the scam of the 1969 Act of free Choice.

I have continued to travel inside Indonesia to meet and have discourse with Indonesia Political and Business leaders since 1995. In April last year I had dinner in Jakarta with the head of Panin –ANZ Bank Mr.Goerge lee and also met Mr. Franz Joku in Jayapura prior to the last election where he was a candidate for one of the ten seats representing West Papua in the 500 strong Indonesian national parliament and as I continue met and talk to decision makes inside Indonesia one thing that continues to strike me is the poverty in Indonesia. The poverty is endemic and covers all of rural Indonesia including Bali. Indonesia is a great country and can be a great democracy and can rise up and achieve middle income status as a MINT nation but it must dismantle the last remaining vestiges of its toxic Military culture which allows the military to participate in the economy as a State Actor resulting in the Army using its might to gain advantage over tribal people and their resources. The army is responsible for so much act of Human rights violation against its own People Particularly in West Papua. It is also becoming more and more apparent that West Papua does not want to be part of the Indonesian republic. In the recent work on West Papua Professor Peter King in his work on the OPM has given us a insight into the wide spread nature of the Opposition to Indonesian rule and on how organized this resistance force fore is .Professor King has also demonstrated convincingly the nexus between Human rights Violation and Business carried out by the Military inside West Papua.[ see Peter King on Indonesia Since Soharto, 2004 ]
The world we inherited today is very different to the one inherited by Sukarno and Hatta at the end of 2nd world war and indeed at the 1963 annexation of West Papua and the 1969 act of Free Choice which gave rise to the enslavement of one people by another should not be allowed by the world community to continue and as President Widodo makes his historical trip to PNG since the last official Trip by an Indonesian President Since the visit of President Soharto and Madam Soharto in 1981 , the New President of Indonesia must be encouraged to continue with the ongoing process of democratization within Indonesian Society and to encourage Indonesia to take its place on the World Stage as it stands posed into entering it as a member of the MINT nation with Mexico, Nigeria and Turkey but first it must deal with the ghost of its recent past. It must deal with the 1965 Genocide inside side Indonesia by bringing those responsible to stand trial and it must move to give West Papua its Freedom and Independence.

Gabriel Ramoi
Port Moresby

PNG Remains Far Behind Developed Democracies In Harshly Critical (and Effective!) Political Images

$
0
0
By Government  Bureaucrat
In the years after independence and into the 1990's, no PNG newspaper would print a letter to the editor that was harshly critical of any leaders.  It was expected and assumed that politicians should be given automatic respect, particularly Father of Our Nation Sir Michael Somare.

Unfortunately, by the 1990s it was becoming obvious that our politicians were taking advantage of this automatic respect.  They were abusing the public trust placed in them by finding ways to stuff their own pockets full of wealth while supposedly serving the people's interest.   Corruption, which was almost non-existent in PNG until the late 1980's, began to take off, especially during the Sir Julius Chan administration in the 1990s. 

In PNG we are sometimes very slow to respond to changing events.  The same seemed to be true as corruption took off in our country.   People didn't respond at first.  But with each new corruption story, people started getting fed up.  Many angry letters about corruption must have been in sent to the newspapers, because finally very angry worded letters against politicians started to be published for the first time in PNG history.  Once that door of free speech was opened, it has never again closed.   Today one finds harshly critical letters that sometimes come close to blaspheming certain politicians.  In that respect, PNG has caught up with the civilised democracies of the world, where people regularly rubbish their leaders.  

Cartoons that make fun of our politicians have lagged behind.  Even now, any cartoons about politicians that appear in our newspapers are soft and ineffective.   It has long been said that a picture is worth a thousand words.  What this means is that images can have impact way beyond what equivalent words would achieve.  That's why political cartoons are so important in opening people's eyes and keeping politicians under control.   Well chosen words can anger but equivalent cartoons can infuriate.  Either way, it moves people to do things that they wouldn't have done otherwise.  Infuriating politicians is done throughout the world purposely and the purpose is to get those pollies to toe the line and do the right thing.  Political cartoons that have kick also are effective in energising people themselves to start doing more to fight corruption or other problems that politicians might be causing.

Our corrupt politicians must thank God that we show so respectful to them.  They would never survive in office, much less be able to continue their monkey businesses, if they lived in Australia, America, or almost any European country.  They would be rubbished in the newspapers right and left, especially through the use of cartoons. 

Look at the cartoons on this page.  Unbelievable, some of them!  Can you imagine this kind of cartoon making fun of Peter O'Neill or any other of our PNG leaders ever appearing in our PNG newspapers?   Definitely not!  They're even rare on the social media.  Why do we avoid creating and publishing such cartoons in PNG?   Because too many of us feel that we need to treat our leaders with respect, no matter how bad they might be.  

 
American president George W Bush

Treating politicians with respect - why?   Are they performing in ways that deserve our respect?   Doesn't giving all our politicians blind respect also give them the freedom to become even more out of control and more corrupt?  

 
Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott


If you do some internet research on the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions index for countries whose people treat their politicians with the least automatic respect, you're in for a shock!  The countries whose people show the least blind respect for their leaders are all countries with low levels of corruption!

 
British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher

It's all well and fine to say we should treat our politicians with respect.   But by doing so, it may be our respect that plays a big role in our politicians feeling free to misbehave as much as they want.  They reckon that we'll still respect them even if they behave like pigs digging through pekpek.   You know something?  They'll be right!   Misbehave all you want, PNG pollies.  We'll still respect you!

My feeling is that we are creating more problems for ourselves and encouraging corruption by not rubbishing our politicians the way politicians are rubbishes in so many developed democracies of the world.
 
Australian Prime Minister John Howard

 
American president Barack Obama

 
German Chancellor Angela Merkel

A TWISTED DILEMMNA IN PNG POLITICS AND DEVELOPMENT

$
0
0

PNG is an independent nation since its Political Independence in September 1975. The political system adopted in PNG is called Westminster System from England. It is a Democratic System of government and the basis of its ideology is based on the slogan “Power for the people” meaning the power belongs to the people. They have the right and power to accept or reject a leader in and out of the Parliament. Hence, the freedom of each person is expressed through free voting of their leaders. Each elected member serves his or her term in the Parliament for five years and after every five years new national elections for choosing leaders begin again. All elected leaders are representatives of the people in the Parliament and they are means of bringing services and development to their people.

Papua New Guinea’s Constitution is based on the Democratic System of Government. “In the months immediately before Independence on 16 September 1975, the Constitutional Planning Committee (CPC) was set up and the drafting of the Five National Goals and Directive Principles was produced. These were incorporated in the Preamble to the Constitution. The purpose of the goals is to provide for PNG a “guiding lamp” for national development in its approach” The goals include: (1) Integral human development, (2) Equality and participation, (3) National sovereignty and self-reliance,  (4) National resources and environment and (5)-Papua New Guinea ways

The Five National Goals and Directive Principles emphasize clearly of personal liberation and PNG ways as the basic for development-one goal being “to achieve development primarily through the use of PNG forms of social, political and economic organization.” Primarily these goals are very central and they are the guiding hands to the whole concept of development in PNG. However, it seems that the National Goals and Directive Principles are only the pen and paper composition and sweet words budging around. In reality these goals are impracticable if they are not keeping up to their original plan as set up in the Constitution since Independence.

Hence, looking at the trend in which PNG is heading, in so far as development is concerned, there is a clear indication of very little progress. Look at the deteriorating situation of the existing government infrastructures and the people’s cry for development in the rural areas. People are wondering where and how PNG has gone wrong. This raises the question of how soon can the people experience a better development in the rural areas. They are still asking this same question “When are we going to see changes and development in our rural areas?” Contrary, what is evident right now is that the rights of the people for equal benefits of development as spelled out clearly in the Constitution is not fulfilled. It contradicts this very principle of our constitution.

When some of our leaders are in for a wrong intention, only for their own benefit, it seems everything, in so far as development and other benefits are concerned, is blurred and becomes impossible for the people to benefit. As a result suffering is experienced always by the people. Thus, “it seems that for personal power, prestige, possessions and privileges, we conveniently forget about our duty to future generations of PNG.” As soon as this happens, it puts the stop to any plan for further progress and the leaders are enjoying the good life at the expense of the little people who mandated them to listen to their needs. This is not happening as is evident in the country at present.

Apparently, the result of no proper administration and delivering of the basic goods and services to the people have created a certain widening gap between the rich and the poor. It is obvious that the so-called rich have benefited most from the vast resources of PNG while the poor and little people have been totally deprived of rightful benefits. Even the land owners are suffering from their own land without any proper benefits at all.             

Chief Sir Michael Somare, the founding Prime Minister once said: “To understand where we are going, we must understand what has happened and what is happening to us.” Taking this statement into consideration I would like to comment on two questions. Firstly, where is PNG heading? And secondly, are our national leaders capable of delivering the basic services to the people? It will be 40 years of celebration of independence comes 16 September 2015. PNG is certainly old enough to move forward with prosperity and benefits for the people with its rich mineral resources and agricultural products. It that happening? 

A better chance of life for this country depends on our national leaders and others in authority who believe in the interest of the country and its people first rather than their own. Definitely PNG has a leadership problem, leaders who do not clearly understand their roles and functions. It seems our leaders are not capable and do not understand when and how to take a drastic measure in their decisions and say no to corrupt dealings. We need leaders who can take a courageous and an honest stand in all dealings of the affairs of the country for the interest of the people and its future generations. PNG needs such leaders who really have the heart for this country and the interest of the nation first.

The political scenario in PNG is different at this time since it has taken a new twist with corruption creeping into all levels of life. It can be seen practiced by our national leaders and people in high offices, and it is even practiced by the ordinary people. It has definitely influenced and affected the lives of the people and the good governance of PNG. We have a situation where our leaders have access to all the luxuries of life while the bulk of the population is struggling to survive in the midst of rising costs. There is a lot to be desired about the way PNG is heading at present in regard to lack of essential basis infrastructural services like education, medicines, good excess to roads, electricity in the village, good water supply, and many other basic services are non-existent. The struggle to survive in the problem of increasing price of goods and services is a major obstacle for ordinary people. Thus, it seems that the government only exists for certain professional elites and bureaucrats of this nation while the underprivileged and ordinary citizens are neglected as they struggle every day for survival.

When faced with such dilemma, that prompted many to think about how rich PNG is in vast resources of gold, silver, oil, gas, fish and forests that bring millions of kina into the country every year, enough for better services and infrastructural development for its citizens, and yet nothing happens and everything seems impossible. Apparently, we can already see the soaring gap between the rich and the poor which is widening and the whole political and economic system only favors the privileged and the rich people of this country, while the poor and ordinary people are suffering in an unfair manner in their own land. Is PNG going to this path for another 40 years?   


Papua New Guinea shocked by Australian diplomatic move

$
0
0
SYDNEY (Reuters) - Papua New Guinea's prime minister on Thursday said he was shocked by an announcement from former colonial ruler Australia that it might open a diplomatic mission in the restive island of Bougainville, where a referendum on independence is scheduled.

Polls opened on Monday in the copper-rich Autonomous Region of Bougainville to elect a president ahead of a referendum on independence from Papua New Guinea. A result is expected on June 8.

"There has been no consultation on this proposal and there is no agreement to proceed," Prime Minister Peter O'Neill said after addressing business and academic leaders in Sydney to mark the end of Australian rule 40 years ago.

"Bougainville is an integral part of Papua New Guinea."

Under a peace agreement signed after a nine-year civil war with the Papua New Guinea mainland ended in 1998, Bougainville has until June 2020 to hold the referendum.

The conflict forced resources giant Rio Tinto to abandon its Panguna copper mine in Bougainville. At the time, the mine was the largest single source of export revenue in Papua New Guinea and comprised about 7 percent of the world's copper production.

Rio Tinto, through its majority-owned Bougainville Copper Co, has insisted it will consider prospects for a restart only when the island's political and civil situation stabilizes.

O'Neill said he only learned about the proposal for a diplomatic post in Bougainville when reading papers issued by Australia this week outlining its fiscal 2016 national budget.

"We were shocked to learn from the budget documents that Australia is planning on establishing a diplomatic post in Bougainville," he said.

A representative for Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop said the proposal was discussed in December and that Australia's High Commissioner to Papua New Guinea formally advised the government before Tuesday's release of the budget.

The Australian government assumed responsibility for the southern half of modern-day Papua New Guinea in 1906 by agreeing to take control of what was then a British colony.

During World War One, Australian forces expelled German administrators from the northern half and claimed the entire country an Australian territory.

By the 1970s, control of Papua New Guinea was affording little strategic benefit to Australia and many Papua New Guineans yearned for independence, which came in September 1975.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/r-papua-new-guinea-shocked-by-australian-diplomatic-move-2015-5#ixzz3a9cIQfRG

DIPLOMATIC BUNGLE: FACE OFF BETWEEN O'NEILL AND BISHOP

$
0
0

A diplomatic row between the PNG and Australia over the latter's plans to open a diplomatic mission in Autonomous Region of Bounganville has captured the headlines in recent days. It has raised two important issues firstly who is telling the truth whether or not there was any consultation between the two Governments and secondly the presumptuous position the Australian Government has taken to make a budget commitment on such a sensitive issue years ahead of any declaration of independence for Bougainville.

On the first issue our Prime Minister Peter O'Neill and his Foreign Minister Rimbink Pato have publicly announced they were shocked by the move. Prime Minister O'Neill claimed he only first learned about it from the media coverage of the Australian Abott Government Budget. He said "we don't want governments to go around creating offices everywhere around the country that will create the wrong interpretation and wrong meaning to our people". Meanwhile Pato has described it as outrageous and mischievous, both proclaiming there has been no consultation by the Abott Government.

A spokesperson for Australian Foreign Minister Julie Bishop has rejected the claims by O'Neill and Pato stating and that Ms Bishop can't fathom the reaction from the O'Neill Government. To support her position Ms Bishop submits evidence of ABC report in December 2014 confirming that she had discussed her proposal to open a secondary post in PNG while on her visit to Autonomous Region. Further that Australian High Commissioner to PNG had also formally advised the O'Neil Government of its intention to establish a new diplomatic presence in the lead up to the 2015 budget.

So on the issue on who is telling the truth I believe it would be safe to assume it would be Ms Bishop. In my opinion our Prime Minister has one of the worst track records for being untruthful further still being deceptive and evasive when it comes to the truth of most issues.

The second more contentious issue is why the Australian Government would seek to make a budget commitment to establish a diplomatic mission in the Autonomous Region of Bouganville in 2015 when a referendum isn't likely for several years. In principle they seem to be putting the cart (foreign mission) before the horse (Boungainville's Independence).

Most Papua New Guinean's know little of the Bougainville Referendum or the terms of the Peace Agreement signed in 2001 that brought an end to the 11 year conflict promising Bougainville Autonomy and independence from PNG through a referendum.

Ten's of thousands of people died as a direct or indirect result of the conflict, which began in 1989 and dragged on until the early months of 1998. Suffering on the island was widespread, it was reported that 70,000 of a population of 180,000-200,000 were displaced in care centres or camps. In October 1997 a truce was agreed that lead to the introduction of 250 Truce Monitoring Group (TMG), headed by New Zealand and included members from Australia, Fiji and Vanuatu deployed from until April 1998. In April 1998 a permanent ceasefire was reached.

An Australian-led Peace Monitoring Group (PMG) was then deployed to replace the TMG to end of July 1998. They were succeeded by the deployment of the United Nations Observer Mission on Bougainville (UNOMB).

On 30 August 2001, a Bougainville Peace Agreement was signed in Arawa. The agreement included a weapons disposal plan and provided for elections for the establishment of an autonomous government on Bougainville. It also promised for a referendum, 10 to 15 years after the election of an Autonomous Bougainville Government (ABG), on the question of Bougainville's independence.

The PNG Government amended the PNG Constitution to provide the legislative framework and foundation for the terms reached in the Bougainville Peace Agreement. In essence it was no longer just a mere agreement but Constitutional law.

The constitutional amendments provided for Bougainville's own Constitution, the establishment of it's own structure of Government, Parliament, Police, Judicial System, CIS, Public Service etc. The most revealing point in the Bougainville Constitution is that it's preamble declaration expresses self-determination of the people through both autonomy arrangements and the referendum on independence; and to recognize the sovereignty of the people.

Both PNG and Bougainville Constitutions provide the promise of Referendum for Independence. Section 338 of PNG Constitution states a Referendum shall be held on a date agreed after consultation by Bougainville with National Government, that it shall not be held earlier than ten years and no later than 15 years after election of the first Bougainville Government. Following the peace agreement the first Bougainville Government was elected in June 2005. The ten year anniversary is June 2015, which means the Referendum is now on the table for the next five years until June 2020. A referendum is a direct vote in which an entire electorate in this case Bougainville Provincial Electorate will be asked to vote on whether or not to seek independence from PNG.

The law states that the date of Referendum shall be determined only after considering whether weapons have been disposed of in accordance with the Agreement; and the Bougainville Government has been and is being conducted in accordance with internationally accepted standards of good governance. Which includes democracy, the opportunity for participation by Bougainvilleans, transparency, accountability, and respect for human rights and the rule of law.

The legislation does provide that the Bougainville Referendum may not be held if so decided by the Bougainville Government 3/4 majority of its 40 members decides after consultation with the National Government.

So for many Papua New Guinea's who take objection to Bouganville breaking away from PNG by achieving independence it's clear from the terms of the peace agreement crafted during the term of Skate & Morauta Governments your views or opinions have no useful purpose.

O'Neill Government raises the issue of lack consultation with regard to Australia's plans to open a new foreign mission on Bougainville on the same token it seems our Government failed to consult 5-6 million people of the Independent State of PNG before making the monumental decision promising Boungainville independence.

The central issue that lead to the Bougainville conflict and it's people seeking independence was brought on by a corrupt PNG Government. Even after almost 26 years the same issue of corruption still exists today.

What is certain from Prime Minister O'Neill comments in the media is that his Government may not honour the terms of peace agreement seeing Bougainville obtaining independence. The dispute will most likely end up in in the Courts delaying any Referendum for some years to come. So any plans by the Australian Government set up a high commission in Bougainville should be reconsidered and reverted back to the drawing board.

ISSUES WITH COMMENT MANAGER

$
0
0

We have run into some problems with our Comment Manager. Please bear with us while this problem is resolved.

Thanks


PNGBLOGS

Namah is no saint

$
0
0
by JOHN R.WAROLO

The truth has been coming out for years but this latest Namah con game is what finally wakes us up to what Belden Namah has been doing right under our noses for years and even reported on the social media. He has been involved in one con game after another since at least 2008 when he was Forest Minister and at this point, only a fool wouldn't have figured out the real pasin blo Belden. Want a summary of Namah's Bewani scam? Here it is:

Belden Namah and Jimmy Tse partnered some years back to scam 'investors' out of their money. Bewani SABL was the perfect bait, being an incredibly large and rich source of valuable hardwood timber, all of which could be legally taken for free under the provisions of the resource grabbing SABL 99 year lease (PNG government receives not 1 toea in royalties from timber cut on SABLs). Namah and Tse reckoned that gave them the freedom to charge the "developers" for the timber themselves. There had already been so many SABLs where loggers had escaped their responsibility of planting cash crops as soon as they finished their logging, that is seems Namah and Tse weren't all that concerned if this happened to Bewani.

It appears that Namah's 2012 campaign money came at least partly from Jimmy Tse's purchase of 100% of the Bewani SABL from Namah only 1 month after Namah got it registered. We also know that when Namah was Forestry minister, they attracted (probably equally unscrupulous) Malaysian investor Andrew Lim to deposit at least US $10 million into bank accounts scattered from Fiji to Hongkong, From 2007-2009, Lim deposited another nearly US $500,000 into accounts of Tse and Namah, again scatttered across the Pacific. What Lim didn't know was that Tse had secretly brought in 2 Malaysian loggers, Tee and Tee, to Bewani. Namah's partner, Jimmy Tse, then issued a bunch of new shares in the development which reduced Lim's interest in Bewani from majority shareholder to only owning a tiny fraction of the development. The scam was finished, the money was made.

As long as Namah had his pockets filled with money, he wasn't too concerned about either his people or what was going on back home with the logging. But there are enough reports to confirm Namah's addiction to gambling and overall he seems to have the same ability to handle money as someone straight out of the stone age. he past few months, it became apparent that Namah was running out of money fast. His own people were getting angrier and angrier that no oil palm was being planted, something that Namah knew about all along, but which he neatly avoided by doing what most politicians do - he stayed well away from his people.

As his money reserves headed for empty, for some reason he wasn't able to milk Malaysians Tee and Tee out of enough money to satisfy his needs. They obviously weren't interested in cutting their own profits to put money into Namah's pockets. Increasingly desperate, Namah, hatched a scheme to pull another "Andrew :Lim scam", but this time becoming Sandaun governor so that he could kick Tee and Tee off Bewani land and bring in another developer, this time a businessman from India.

Presumably the Indian promised to plant oil palm after shipping out all the valuable hardwoods, but Namah shouldn't count on that. Scumbags tend to attract other scumbags, and the end game is little more than a game of who can con the other out of their money, no holds barred. After all, the money they're playing with isn't theirs. They've conned it out of someone else prior to the challenge!

PNG HIGHLANDS TURNING TO ISLAM

$
0
0
by FATHER FRANCO ZOCCA SVD– Melanesian Institute (Goroka)

My interest in Islam stems from the 14 years I worked in Indonesia, where the great majority of the population is Muslim. When I came to PNG 20 years ago I set aside my interest in Islam since I thought there were no Papua New Guinean Muslims. I discovered that Islam had arrived in PNG about 15 years ago when I read a newspaper report that a mosque had opened near Kimbe in West New Britain. I visited it, and to my surprise, found that the new Muslim converts were Simbu people—originally Catholic—who worked on an oil palm plantation. I was even more surprised to learn that that they belonged to an Islamic reformist movement founded in India in the late 19th century called Ahmadiyya, after the name of its founder.

Later, I discovered that those Simbus were not the first Papua New Guineans to turn to Islam. The registration of the Islamic Society in PNG in December 1983 confirmed Islam as a permitted religion and from that time on, expatriate Muslims began recruiting (da’wah) locally. By 1986 four Papua New Guineans had pronounced the Sahadah (Act of Faith) and become followers of Islam. The first was a young man from Bougainville, who was given the Arabic name Bilal, which means “dark”. Four years later, according to the 1990 census, there were already 440 Muslim residents in PNG. By the year 2000, their number had risen to 756, of whom 476 were PNG citizens. Interestingly, out of the total of 756, 293 were living in Port Moresby, 204 in Simbu and 65 in West New Britain. Other pockets of Muslim citizens could be found in Morobe (56), Western Province (27), Western Highlands (25), West Sepik (23), and East New Britain (13).

What is the situation in 2013? Although the National Statistical Office (NSO) has not yet released the 2011 census figures that give a breakdown of people’s religious affiliation, I recently visited the Islamic Centre in Port Moresby and interviewed the leaders of the Islamic Society of PNG. They estimated the local Muslim population to be about 4,000. We will see whether this number is confirmed by the census results.

The Islamic leaders in Port Moresby said that Islam was growing especially quickly in the Highlands, particularly so in Simbu (the leaders of the Islamic Society of PNG are all from Simbu). New converts were coming from the districts of Gumine, Nomane, Chuave and Kerowagi—places where the people generally became either Catholic or Lutheran at the arrival of Western missionaries and Australian colonizers. They also said that people around Mendi and in the Hela region were interested in Islam.

When I asked the leaders why Papua New Guineans were converting to Islam, they gave several reasons, such as the respectable conduct of Muslims, the prohibition of alcohol and other intoxicating substances, and religious guidelines that give order and direction to the whole life of believers. They were also strongly of the opinion that Islamic beliefs and practices are more compatible than Christianity with traditional Melanesian values and customs. As examples they cited Islam’s acceptance of polygamy, the separation of men and women, avoidance of menstruating women, male supremacy, not walking behind women, and men’s wearing of beards and moustaches.

I also asked about barriers local people faced in becoming Muslim. The leaders cited the importance of pigs in social life and bride price, and modern Western influences on young people. It is not easy to convince modern Melanesian women to wear the jilbab (traditional Muslim dress for women) or men to renounce alcohol and pork. Another stumbling block is the bad name that Muslims have in the media, where Islam is frequently linked to fanaticism, terrorism and anti-modernism.
The Muslim community in PNG is currently served by 15 Islamic centres led by imams (leaders). Young Papua New Guinean Muslims have been sponsored to study overseas in Koranic schools in Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Fiji. When they return they will provide their Islamic communities with much needed imams, teachers, scholars and Koranic lawyers. In the meantime Muslim children are instructed in the Islamic Faith and the Arabic language on Saturdays and Sundays.

It is still not easy to live as Muslims in PNG. For example, Islamic directives with regard to food and slaughtering of animals are not followed by local shop owners and butchers; pupils and workers are not allowed to interrupt what they are doing to perform the prescribed daily prayers and the Friday Noon Prayer at the mosque; and Muslims wearing the prescribed dress have been verbally and physically abused in public.

In early 2002, the Secretary of the Commission on Ecumenism and Interreligious Dialogue of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference, Fr Bill Fey OFM Cap., together with other Catholic representatives, began meeting with representatives of the Islamic community. This Catholic-Muslim dialogue has continued, with some interruptions, up to the present. Fr Bill Fey, now Bishop of Kimbe, is still the main interlocutor on the Catholic side.

For Christian communities in PNG, and especially the Catholic ones, the rise of Islam in PNG raises some important and disturbing questions. Have Christian roots penetrated deeply or is Christianity only a superficial covering? What was lacking that young people educated in Christian institutions, and even in seminaries, are now turning to Islam? How can we face the challenges presented by the growing presence of Islam among our people? Perhaps this matter could be a topic of discussion at various levels within the Catholic Church in PNG.

The Man from Pangia who sold out PNG's Land Rights through SABL

$
0
0
by MARK WAMBIA

The days of conspicuously cruel forced human labour, in the form of blackbirding and outright slavery, are for the most part long gone. However, the greed to exploit ignorant or passive human beings to do as much work as possible for a 'masta' of any skin colour in return for the least amount of money, is alive and well.

With respect to land, the days are gone where colonizers stole it outright from customary landowners, but again there's a new style around. It's called land grabbing and we've been seeing it in PNG where over 12% of PNG's customary land was lost to foreigners and ratbag national leaders in only about 5 years. The new, improved technique of stealing land (and resources)? It's the 99 year SABL leases.

Today we see a situation where around the world people in developing countries are labouring long and hard for low wages to produce cheap goods for people in developed countries who buy at the lowest price and consume with pleasure.

For most foreign investors PNG is little more than a source of cheap resources and agricultural ground. The problem is the labour. Compared to Indonesia, it's not cheap. We also have this tendency to speak our minds and be a bit uncooperative when we feel that we're being exploited. At least that's how educated people who have learnt the ways of the world react. People who are half educated or not educated at all are far more passive and a lot easier to manipulate. They're the easiest kinds of human beings to make into cheap sources of labour to do the hard menial work of the world.

Enter Peter O'Neill. Almost everything Peter has done is evidence of self-serving greed and the fanatic desire to cling onto power long after his use by date. He does deals with foreign businessmen, such as the still bizarre GE turbo power generators bought through Israeli middlemen when the government could have bought those generators directly from the GE manufacturer for less. PO's likely expectation are secret kickbacks coming his way.

Peter O'Neill has shown a very strange behaviour in regard to the land grabs called SABLs, which Belden Namah is currently in very hot water over. Soon after he became PM, O'Neill set up a commission to investigate SABLs. The Commission came back with the conclusion that most SABLs were land and timber grabbing scams that needed to be stopped. They advised many of the SABL agreements to be cancelled outright. And since then - 694 days to be exact - Peter O'Neill has only made superficial signs of doing anything of the kind. In reality, he has done nothing.

SABLS are a perfect vehicle for eventually enslaving rural people in PNG. Once SABLs deprive customary landowners of their land and resources, the now landless and desperate villagers will work for a lot less than they would have when they were proud landowners, rich in resources. Peter O'Neill can develop a population of near slaves by first allowing national (like Belden Namah) and foreign exploiters (like Rimbunan Hijau, owners of Vision City and The National newspaper) to take away our land, while at the same time developing our muscles but simultaneously keeping us as dumb and ignorant of the outside world as possible.

A wonderful way to achieve this objective is to spend lots of money on sports facilities rather than use any of that money to build libraries, classrooms, university science labs, and the like. Does that mean we're against sports? Of course not. Developing the body helps discipline the mind and that's where sports fit into education. But at the end of the day, we'd rather that our PNG minds have become disciplined through sports so that we can use our brains to be innovative and analytical. Using sports to discipline our brains to obediently do the work of masta once more isn't what we view as development and progress.

First things first. The government needs to get its priorities straight. First build the education infrastructure, and that means fully equipped classrooms, labs and libraries, not the hollow shells that Peter O'Neill has been building all over the nation. After we've got something to feed eager young minds with, then we can start worrying about the sports stadiums, fancy volleyball courts, and swimming pools.

Development is all about having proper priorities.

THE STORY OF THE HAPPY GARDNER

$
0
0
by JAMES PEREYAP

Never was a less fitting nickname given to Justin Tkatchenko than the "Happy Gardener". That's because he's far from happy most of the time, especially with those unfortunate enough to work under him. He rants and raves, screams and rudely puts down those around him quite regularly. To put it mildly, he's the stereotyped 'masta' we all heard about that in the days before Independence used to run around screaming us "stupid kanakas". Justin isn't a pleasant fellow.

Of course, amongst his political allies it's a different story. With them, Justin is highly appreciated. He's cozy with them and them with him. Long ago in the days of Rock n roll Bill Skate, Justin learnt how to kickback money into hungry pockets in return for parliamentary landscaping contracts. "I pat your arse and you pat mine" was a skill that Justin picked up quickly and very, very naturally. Back in those days, Justin was a good understudy to Bill Skate, David Unagi, and other Moresby scumbags. They were all happy to let the 'masta' personality return back to PNG and rewarded him handsomely for his ability to crack the whip and get things done. Just like Hitler did.

At one point, after Justin got a 'loan' to buy the only POM mortuary, Skate even had one of Unagi's bodyguards killed and the body delivered to Justin's new operation. Bringing in the bacon, as they say, although that term would have better fit Unagi. Skate bragged about the killing when secretly videotaped by Australian scumbag businessman Muja Sefa. But as always in PNG, we forgive and forget. There was never an investigation into Skate because most of us just don't care in PNG what our politicians do.

The whole picture of Justin Tkatchenko is that of a general ratbag and corrupt manipulator. A big fish attracted to the small pond of PNG. A fraud, a fake and a fascist. That's why a lot of people are praying for Justin's failure at the Pacific Games. They reckon it is long deserved payback for the contempt our Tkatchenko has thrown at the grassroots of Papua New Guinea for the last two decades. Justin Tkatchenko came to PNG supposedly to do good and has done very well indeed.

The hatred towards the fascist Happy Gardener is so strong these days that it almost overshadows people's hopes that the Pacific Games will be PNG's chance to shine. There are as many people right now in Moresby pointing fingers and laughing at the poor progress of some of the construction projects as there are those who are crossing their fingers that it'll all get done in time.

That's a bit sad to behold, but there didn't have to be this kind of disunity. The fact is that Justin Tkatchenko is symbolic of absolutely nothing to be proud of as Papua New Guineans about the Pacific Games which are run by foreigners, and built either by foreigners and/or scumbags, thanks to Peter O'Neill using expensive foreign loans to fund the whole mess Justin Tkatchenko has become the national symbol of foreigners getting rich off PNG land and labour.

A well qualified national could have been found to do Justin's job but of course, Peter O'Neill would have none of that. But if this had truly become a genuine product of Papua New Guineans rather than foreigners, more modest facilities had been planned and completed on time, and the Games successfully held, our pride would have exploded with joy come July.

Instead, when the games start, we'll see Justin out in front as usual, chest swelled, taking all the credit while berating (as usual) he staff for any deficiency that catches his eye. Let's cheer for our athletes but give no thanks at all for the incredible indebtedness and waste that Tkatchenko and O'Neill brought the nation of Papua New Guinea through this almost beyond belief scam to reward their cronies through contracts and kickbacks.

But one request for the Happy Gardener after the games are over. Leave us in peace and please give the newspapers a rest at having to publish your ugly face.

Here's your better solution. The Peter O'Neill Way

$
0
0
Intellectuals learnt long ago through hard experience that you can't believe anything Peter O'Neill says. He mixes fact with fiction in a bewildering way that reflects his singleminded focus on self preservation and self enrichment. If the PM felt that telling us all the sky was purple would somehow help him, that's what he'd be telling us. Then a few days later he might flipflop back to the original story. Only those who read the newspapers on a daily basis and remember what they've read will notice this tendency of the PM to lie. The average person probably won't even notice it.

The typical O'Neill story changes now surround the proposed Western Pacific University. At first the government said that the new university would be a model system, with students taught by Australians. That plan seems to have been shelved, including the notion that the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT) would be managing the school. It doesn't look like there will be many students in the intake for years, even after it opens.

As the story continues to change, and more information comes out, the whole idea of building a new university in Ialibu becomes quite illogical!

What reasons does the PM has given us for (odd, isn't it?!) building a new university in his own electorate where there isn't even a small town? Now he says that it's because PNG's existing universities can't hold any more students. That is true, but not because most of them don't have the land. It's because Peter O'Neill hasn't increased their funding significantly ever since he came to power! The cheapest, most logical solution to the "not enough space for students" problem is to build more buildings and otherwise expand the facilities of the existing institutions, not build an entirely new institution in the middle of nowhere.

In this day and age, small institutions stuck out in areas as remote as Ialibu find it almost impossible to be financially viable. Small institutions cannot offer as many classes for a start, so the students don't get as well educated. Also those institutions that are stuck out in areas that lack services certainly will not attract enough good quality teachers.
Nothing about the Western Pacific University makes sense because Peter O'Neill won't come out and tell the truth. The truth is that this is nothing more than a taxpayer-funded way to get more votes in 2017.

Of course it is ethically wrong to plan a nation's development by focusing on one's political survival. But then again, Peter O'Neill is no friend of ethics or doing things honestly. It is no surprise that he'll keep pushing the Western Pacific University idea and vacuum the money needed from a more pressing, logical needs such as keeping the current PNG universities and colleges from what is getting close to financial collapse.

Looking after himself first. Even when he's prime minister and supposed to be focusing on serving the people. That's the Peter O'Neill way.

by GARY KILA

MALADINA GUILTY

$
0
0
AFTER a 17-year wait, the final curtain is about to fall on the National Provident Fund (NPF) saga when its central player – Jimmy Maladina – was found guilty of misappropriating K2.65 million by the Waigani National Court yesterday.

In a 24-page ruling, Deputy Chief Justice Sir Gibbs Salika likened Maladina’s crime to "money laundering" and "dishonest".
He was chairman of the private sector superfund NPF in 1999 which had since changed its name to Nasfund.

Maladina, from Mena’ala in Esa’ala, Milne Bay Province, was found guilty of one count of conspiring with other persons to defraud NPF by fraudulently increasing the construction costs of the NPF Tower (Deloitte Tower) in downtown Port Moresby.
He was also found guilty of the second charge of dishonestly applying to his own use and of others the same amount.

The conspiracy offence was committed between November 1, 1998, and October 10, 2000, while the second offence took place between February 26 and July 30, 1999.
The alleged conspiracy was that Maladina and others agreed for Kumagai Gumi Limited, engaged to build the NPF Tower, to charge extra fees, termed as "acceleration fees", on top of the contract price of K50 million for the construction.

It was found that from the K2,650,000 alleged acceleration fees, a total of K400,000 was received by Maladina via transactions, described by Sir Gibbs as "money laundering".
On the pretext of obtaining money from Papua New Guinea Banking Corporation for the contract, Kumagai had paid the money to a Ken Yapane, who then paid some to Carter Newell Lawyers, Finance Corporation (FinCorp), Ram Business Consultants, Ulya Real Estates and others, the court heard.

From Carter Newell Lawyers, Maladina got his K400,000 cut, the court heard even though Kumagai and Carter Newell Lawyers had no client-lawyer relationship.
Oral evidence was given by Sir Brown Bai who said he was chairman of the NPF board of trustees in 1998 until he was replaced by Maladina after January 2, 1999.

The decision to appoint Madadina was made the prime minister Bill Skate (deceased), he said.
The court heard that after Maladina was appointed chairman, the questionable deals and transactions started surfacing. Maladina was the managing partner of Carter Newell Lawyers but what the K400,000 payment was for was never established in court.

"I therefore, consider the accused actions as being dishonest in this case.
"Accordingly I find him guilty to the charge of misappropriation of K2 650 000 as well. I note too that the accused through his lawyer has admitted receiving K400,000," Sir Gibbs said.
The State and Maladina’s lawyers are expected to make submissions on his sentencing on June 4.

SOURCE: POST COURIER

PNG NOT IN A POSITION TO NEGOTIATE HOW LOAN IS SPENT

$
0
0
by KEVIN MEMEH

Reports from many government departments are painting the same picture: a government that has badly overspent, is way over budget and can't even pay for the basics in health and education. The money crunch is already bad, promised government monies aren't coming into the ministries and it all promises to get worse.

It would be one thing if this overexpenditure was all staying within PNG to benefit PNG. Sadly that's not the case. PNG has long been one of the great foreign aid providers of the world. What do you think we mean by that statement? Maybe we're referring to Peter O'Neill's commitments of sizeable donations to Fiji and Solomon Islands? No, we're not.

We're talking about the PNG government handout to the world in the form of literal fortunes being given to foreign construction companies to build PNG infrastructure. Why is it that we've been independent for 2 generations and still seem incapable of building our own needed infrastructure in any quality way? At least that's what the government would have us believe.

The most outrageous assistance the PNG government gives to developing people outside PNG is the K6 billion loan from the Chinese government Exxim bank that has been used to hire Chinese companies to send Chinese workers to build infrastructure in PNG. Complain all you want about Australian foreign aid and how much bounces back into the hands of Australians. At least the money wasn't a loan to the PNG government but a gift.

The Japanese started the nonsense of calling loans "foreign aid" to fool the PNG public. The once new Jacksons airport was built with Japanese foreign aid but not donated money! This was a loan. Even worse, the loan agreement required that the majority of the money go to Japanese companies to design and construct the airport.

The K6 billion Exxim bank loan to PNG (labeled as Chinese foreign aid) is worse worse yet. The amount of money involved i huge. Again, the loan conditions require that Chinese government companies be used to build most of the infrastructure, and thus we are paying the Chinese in all kinds of ways. We're paying their salaries, their government construction companies (China Railways) and their government banks.

The loan was originally supposed to be mostly used to rehabilitate the highlands highway, many parts of which have become a chronic disaster zone. Immediately their were oddities in the almost unbelievably high prices that were quoted to build sections of road in PNG. Immediately some began to suspect that the costs had been jacked up to allow the provision of illegal kickbacks into the hands of local and national government officials.

If all that weren't enough,the O'Neill government decided to shift a big chunk of the loan away from the highlands highway and other badly needed road reconstruction projects and use it instead to help build Pacific Games infrastructure. How beneficial will this infrastructure be in stimulating economic growth after the games are over, compared against if the money had been used as intended on the highlands highway, the economic artery of the nation?

What an incredible waste of money. All willingly approved by our Prime Minister.

POLITICS AND BUSINESS IN PNG: INSEPARABLE PARTNERS IN CRIME

$
0
0
by LUCAS KIAP 

When it comes to development and providing basic government services in the country - is where billions and billions of Kina of public funds are pumped into every year. Year-in-year-out, every government, when comes into office makes headlines across the country - announcing big budgets for development, raising the hope of the people because they want it badly.

Despite billions of kina have been spent every year on development and delivery of basic government services to the people, people still complain about the lack of development and vital basic government services and how they struggle to survive without it.

Where are those billions of Kina budgeted by the government disappear to?

In Papua New Guinea politics and business cannot be separated from each other. To be a politician is to be a businessman or vice versa. This misconception of politics as a means to wealth accumulation explains why businessmen, ordinary persons, civil servants, priests and pastors when voted into parliament disappear and reappear as business entrepreneurs.

What happens in between?

The first thing that comes to a mind of a politician when he/she is first get elected to parliament is to find ways and means to enrich themselves from public funds meant for development.

To accomplish this evil greed, there are four (4) many ways in which large amounts of public funds are diverted by corrupt politicians for their personal gain:

(1) ESTABLISHING K2 COMPANIES

Corrupt politicians they either set up new businesses or use their existing businesses. Sometimes they allow their family members or political cronies to register businesses. These businesses are strategically placed in line with government development objectives or strategies so that development funds can be diverted into the account of their companies or government contracts can be awarded to the companies, which they have an interest.

To enable these companies to engage in government contracts, they (politicians and government officials) go to every extreme to manipulate and distort checks and balances so that contracts can be awarded to these companies, sometimes by bribing the persons responsible for executing and awarding government contracts. Sometimes it is the opposite. Companies that bidding for lucrative government contracts bribe politicians and bureaucrats or those responsible for the facilitation and awarding of these contracts.

(2) ESTABLISHING DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND SCAMS

Most of the development projects the government has been proposing and funded are nothing but scams to divert and steal public funds by corrupt politicians, bureaucrats and their cronies.

People must be aware of this.

Politicians' personal interests are always factored into every development concept and projects the government proposes and funds.
In the pretext of funding development projects, public funds are diverted into those projects and eventually stolen.

There are cases of such where public funds have been diverted and eventually got stolen. Such examples are; the RESI funds, Boarder Development Authority, Madang Marine Park, Central City, Solomon Island High Commission Building, and you can name the others. These development projects alone have cost the State and the Tax Payers millions of Kina but some of the projects are yet to be built.

K15million DSIP funds given to MPs every year is one of those development concepts where public funds are funded straight into the pockets of MPs for them to use on anything they wish without checks and balances.

(3) IN INFLATION OF CONTRACT VALUES

Corrupt politicians and government officials inflate the contract values, three or four times more than the actual contract value.

Who benefits form the inflated costs?

The inflated free money ended up at the bank accounts of corrupt politicians and corrupt government officials who facilitates and enable such illicit transactions.

(4) CONTRACT VARIATIONS AND K2 COMPANIES

The government lost every millions of Kina through contract variations by K2 companies which don't have the capacity, technical expertise - know how, equipment, and resources to build high standard and high quality infrastructures wort the costs.

The K2 companies ended up deliberately or unintentionally delay the project schedules and later they apply for contract variations. Because corrupt politicians and bureaucrats have vast personal interests in those companies, the variations get approved without further questions being asked.

These K2 companies usually don't have the capacity, experience and capability to construct high standard and high quality infrastructures. To make worse, either the government nor these K2 companies, don't have quality control and monitoring systems to monitor the integrity of infrastructures projects to ensure compliance with accepted standards and industry best practices throughout design, engineering, procurement and construction phases. As a result what they built often comes apart or deteriorates quickly into few years of operations.

To quarantine this, the government spends more money maintaining the same low quality and substandard infrastructures - the money which could have been used for developing other parts of the country, which still lacks basic government services.

To make even worse, the government does not monitor what infrastructure projects it funds around the country allowing public funds to be diverted elsewhere or simply disappeared without the actual projects being carried out.

Corrupt politicians, bureaucrats, and cronies are to be held accountable for creating a poor country in a rich country.

The question is - when are we going to end the apparent robbing of the country?

IF IT HAS TAKEN US 40 YEARS TO SCREW UP OUR OWN COUNTRY, HOW MANY MORE YEARS WE NEED TO COMPLETELY SCREW UP OUR COUNTRY?

The Concept of Nation-State:Diversity and Unity is PNG

$
0
0


by CASPER DAMIEN
 
“Papua New Guinea, a land of the unexpected with diverse ethnic cultures with more than 800 different languages and tribal groups and yet one country.”  
 
Nation refers to groups of people, usually but not exclusively, defined geographically. They are people which may trace back to common ancestry and are identified by common language, culture, history and religion. Such groups of peoples have and do claim the rights of political autonomy.
There is a sense or strong feeling of “nationalism”, a political and legal doctrine about the recognition of their political rights. The most important of these rights is the right of ‘self-determination’. This is usually taken as requiring ‘self-government’.  

Nationalism has an ambiguous quality, in that it can be either positive or negative. In the positive it is an expression of cultural diversity, of a desire of a group of people to continue and to develop in a way of their own choosing. In the negative, expresses as a counter-cultural phenomenon, calling upon simplistic, at best, or bigoted, at worst, invariably divisive notions of ethnic and religious identity in order to exclude others.

The pride or patriotism of Nationalism, for which ‘National Socialism’ is the most authentic voice (not that everyone would agree with that), must eventually express itself in conflict with other nations, necessarily seen as inferior. Such friction is often accompanied by campaigns of virulent hatred. For that reason, philosophers such as Hobbes and Kant have traditionally favoured the withering away of the nation-state and the creation of supernatural institutions.

Most colonial peoples such as Papua New Guineans in the pre-independent period began to experience such feelings of resentment and hatred towards the colonial masters. But more so the patriotism of nationalism were evident in the ethnic groups within Papua New Guineans. Because we were not one nation but many nations. Thus, many nationalities. Historically, Papua New Guinea is made up of two different territories. The Territory of German New Guinea and the Territory of British New Guinea or Papua. 

Within the two major divisions there were and still are many ethnic groups or nations. So the nationalistic feelings were not focused on one nation of PNG but rather on these smaller nations consisting of the ethnic groupings followed by the two territories. 

Hence, when we were preparing for independence, such expressions as: “a hebou” and “bung wantaim” were common and spreading right throughout all corners of all tribal groups in an attempt to draw attention to the need for unity of the many nations within the common territorial boundary.
Eventually, on the 16th. September, 1975 the Independent State of Papua New Guinea was born. The Late Prime Minister Gough Whitlam of Australia gave PNG as a nation its independent statehood. Hence, an Independent State of Papua New Guinea composed of over 800 nationalities was recognized as one Independent State of which we are its proud citizens. 

Despite being under one state we still face problems of unity because we naturally belong to our separate ethnic or national groups. These groups are distinguished by languages and cultural variations we have.  We are patriotic about our ethnic nationalities as well as our Independent State of Papua New Guinea. So we have a problem of having a divided patriotism and nationalism.
However, when we consider ourselves as citizens of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea, our patriotism focuses on our state which unites us despite being of different nations. In other words, although we are of different nationalities with diversified cultural values, we are united by our common citizenship of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea. 

This is what we mean by “Unity in Diversity”. As a result of the diversities in languages, cultural values and practices, we find it difficult to understand each other’s attitudes and value judgments. However, we do our best to accept each other despite such diversities.  We eventually learn to accept pluralism/relativism, which is accepting others as they are with their unique values, beliefs and practices.

By virtue of independence, PNG has become a “United Tribal Nations” or a state made up of many nations. And this Independent State of Papua New Guinea has: Territorial Boundary” and “Sovereignty” which other states are bound to recognize and respect. This recognition and respect of our sovereignty is a moral requirement.

 Any state or multi-national corporation which shows no respect for our sovereignty violates our international moral right or disregards their international moral obligation. For example, can we say the fast exploitation and extraction of gas and oil, gold and copper, timber and fishing with very little benefit to the people’s welfare and development which is a concern now?  Such violations can be in the forms of economic, political and socio-cultural decisions and activities.

In all, we can evaluate the situation we now find ourselves in and the issues at stake: We have moved from Colonialism to Political Independent State with Sovereignty. But we have also been accompanied by: Economic Dependency; Neo-Colonialism and now our sovereignty is being infringed by multi-national corporations and globalism. 

Sovereignty of any state is at stake. Globalism is now the new concept which is bound to wipe out the concept of state. Just as the Greek City-States and PNG Tribal Nations were replaced by the current states, so will the current states be replaced by Globalism. Asylum Seekers problem is an impact of globalism. Where is our future heading to?
Viewing all 2198 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>